This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
en:plutotrx:overview [2021/06/28 15:23] dj0abr |
en:plutotrx:overview [2021/07/03 12:30] dj0abr |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== QO-100 Linux SDR Transceiver ====== | ====== QO-100 Linux SDR Transceiver ====== | ||
- | //**This documentation refers to the current | + | //**This documentation refers to the version 1.67**// |
===== Overview ===== | ===== Overview ===== | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Convenient SDR solutions have been available mainly for Windows users with the SDR console. Users of small Linux boards were limited to simple or hard to use solutions. | Convenient SDR solutions have been available mainly for Windows users with the SDR console. Users of small Linux boards were limited to simple or hard to use solutions. | ||
+ | |||
+ | **On a big PC-Monitor: | ||
{{: | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **and running on a 3, | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
With this SDR transceiver, | With this SDR transceiver, | ||
Line 27: | Line 33: | ||
practically all modern SBCs are suitable. | practically all modern SBCs are suitable. | ||
- | Tested were: Raspberry PI-4, Odroid C4, Odroid N2, Rocket-PI-4.\\ | + | Tested were: Raspberry |
Also suitable is the Orange-PC+, which is however hard at the utilization limit, with the before mentioned SBCs the utilization lies with approx. 30%. | Also suitable is the Orange-PC+, which is however hard at the utilization limit, with the before mentioned SBCs the utilization lies with approx. 30%. | ||